Biden Administration Arms Sales Review - 2021
This page is no longer being updated. Please see this resource page instead, which includes more recent developments.
This resource page details developments related to a January 27 announcement by the Biden administration that it was conducting a broad review of arms sales and a February 4 statement by the President that the US was ending some arms sales in relation to the war in Yemen. The narrative below generally follows in chronological order, with most recent updates near the top.
December
On December 15, Secretary of State Blinken indicated that the U.S. was still seeking to finalize arms sales to the UAE, but did not indicate that all concerns had been resolved, after it was reported that the UAE was suspending talks about the sales the day earlier.
On December 7, the Senate voted 30-67, deciding not to discharge S.J.Res.31 from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, meaning that the Senate did not accept the resolution of disapproval on a possible $650 million foreign military sale to Saudi Arabia.
November
On November 4, the State Department notified Congress of a possible $650 million foreign military sale to Saudi Arabia for two hundred eighty (280) AIM-120C-7/C-8 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) and five hundred ninety-six (596) LAU-128 Missile Rail Launchers (MRL) - rationale offered in this tweet thread about the defensive nature of the weapons. On November 10, a number of Democratic members of the House issued a statement on the sale, calling for a halt to logistical support and spare parts to Saudi Arabia.
On November 12, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) introduced a resolution of disapproval in the House (H.J.Res.63). On November 18, Senators Paul (R-Kentucky), Lee (R-Utah) and Sanders (I-Vermont) introduced the resolution of disapproval in the Senate (S.J.Res 31). [Note: the Senate resolution cites November 15 as the date of Congressional notification, based on the date of publication in the Congressional Record -- impacting the date of the start of the 30-day review clock]. On November 29, more than 40 organizations sent Congress a letter supporting the resolutions.
On November 17, the Biden administration announced via a Statement of Administration Policy that it would be opposing an amendment in the FY 2022 National Defense Authorization Act prohibiting U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, calling the amendment "unnecessary" given its cessation of "support for Saudi-led coalition offensive operations in Yemen."
September
On September 21, House Democrats, responding to pressure from progressive colleagues, removed a provision from the stopgap government funding bill that would have provided $1 billion in funding to Israel's Iron Dome air defense system. The next day, Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee introduced a separate bill (H.R. 5323) to provide the Iron Dome funding, which passed the House in a 420-9 vote on September 23 (see vote). On October 4, Senator Menendez called for unanimous consent to approve funding, to which Sen. Paul objected.
On September 16, the State Department notified Congress that it had approved a possible $500 million deal to provide maintenance support services to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The contract would facilitate maintenance for AH-64 Apache attack helicopters, UH-60 Black Hawk utility helicopters, Schweizer 333 helicopters, and Bell 406CS helicopters belonging to the Royal Saudi Land Forces Aviation Command (RSLFAC). The deal would also facilitate maintenance for a future fleet of Saudi CH-47F Chinook transport helicopters.
On September 15, the State Department confirmed reports that the U.S. would withhold $130 million of a possible $300 in million security assistance to Egypt due to human rights concerns. Sec. 7041 of the 2020 Consolidated Appropriations Act establishes several conditions for the delivery of some U.S. Foreign Military Financing to Egypt, including the investigation and prosecution of extrajudicial killings and "release political prisoners and provide detainees with due process of law." International human rights advocates condemned the release of funds, calling the decision a "betrayal" of Biden's commitment to human rights that "sidesteps the intent of Congress."
May
On May 19, Senator Warren and 15 other Senators sent a letter to President Biden, with the request that he "leverage all influence and tools available, including the potential impact on pending weapons sales, U.S.-Saudi military cooperation, and U.S.-Saudi ties more broadly, to demand that Saudi Arabia immediately and unconditionally stop the use of blockade tactics" in relation to Yemen (emphasis added -- not in original letter)
On May 5, the Biden administration notified Congress of a possible direct commercial sale of $735 million in precision-guided weapons to Israel, which became controversial as fighting in Israel intensified and the notification became more broadly public around May 17. Members of Congress introduced resolutions of disapproval on May 19 and 20. See separate resource page.
April
On April 29, Democratic Senators Bob Menendez, Tim Kaine, Patrick Leahy, Chris Coons, Dianne Feinstein, Patty Murray, and Brian Schatz in introduced the Safeguarding Human Rights in Arms Exports Act of 2021, which if passed could impact future sales and Congressional oversight of them.
At a hearing April 21, Senator Murphy expressed concerns about UAE and other sales, the same day the House of Representatives passed the Protection of Saudi Dissidents Act by a vote of 350-71(first re-introduced on Feb. 26), which could put limits on sales to Saudi Arabia.
On April 16, Senator Foreign Relations Committee Chair Bob Menendez with Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced the Secure F-35 Exports Act that could impact the sale of F-35s to the UAE (or other countries in the Middle East, aside from Israel).
On April 13, news broke that the administration had decided to proceed with arms sales to the United Arab Emirates, with details still to be agreed before any delivery would take place--at least a few years from now. On April 14, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Gregory Meeks issued a statement of concern. Relatedly, on April 14, the New York Center for Foreign Policy Affairs amended its complaint on these arms sales, and released a statement about it. See expert commentary below for additional responses.
February
On February 26, after the release of a report on the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, members of the House introduced legislation to stop arms sales to Saudi Arabia. On March 2, 42 organizations included a similar recommendation in a broad reaching response.
On February 25, 41 members of the House, endorsed by many civil society organizations, issued a letter to President Biden asking for clarity on weapons sales to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, expressing their "strong support for your decision to end U.S. participation in offensive operations in the Saudi/UAE-led war in Yemen, as well as related weapons sales..."
On February 11, more than 75 organizations and experts issued a letter detailing $36.5 billion in arms sales and services to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates that they believe should be consider relevant to "offensive operations" and permanently stopped. (See related Foreign Policy exclusive.)
On February 4, President Biden announced the end of "all American support for offensive operations in the war in Yemen, including relevant arms sales." (More information is still needed to clarify what this means for some specific sales, including to the United Arab Emirates, but includes precision guided munitions to Saudi Arabia according to Jake Sullivan during a press conference earlier in the day.)
January
On January 27, Secretary of State Blinken indicated that the State Department was reviewing arms sales, responding to a press question by saying that "Generally speaking when it comes to arms sales, it is typical at the start of an administration to review any – any pending sales, to make sure that what is being considered is something that advances our strategic objectives and advances our foreign policy. So that’s – that’s what we’re doing at this moment.."
This was separately and widely reported as including review of recent controversial arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the UAE:
Numerous Congressional and civil society leaders have applauded this review and recommended that sales be stopped altogether or conditioned. See resources below, which will be continually updated.
last updated December 8, 2021.
Experts to contact: Kate Kizer, William Hartung, Scott Paul, Annie Shiel, Jeff Abramson, Brittany Benowitz, Elias Yousif, Seth Binder, Jodi Vittori (corruption)
Select Resources
Government (Biden administration)
Congress
Civil Society
December
On December 15, Secretary of State Blinken indicated that the U.S. was still seeking to finalize arms sales to the UAE, but did not indicate that all concerns had been resolved, after it was reported that the UAE was suspending talks about the sales the day earlier.
On December 7, the Senate voted 30-67, deciding not to discharge S.J.Res.31 from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, meaning that the Senate did not accept the resolution of disapproval on a possible $650 million foreign military sale to Saudi Arabia.
November
On November 4, the State Department notified Congress of a possible $650 million foreign military sale to Saudi Arabia for two hundred eighty (280) AIM-120C-7/C-8 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) and five hundred ninety-six (596) LAU-128 Missile Rail Launchers (MRL) - rationale offered in this tweet thread about the defensive nature of the weapons. On November 10, a number of Democratic members of the House issued a statement on the sale, calling for a halt to logistical support and spare parts to Saudi Arabia.
On November 12, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) introduced a resolution of disapproval in the House (H.J.Res.63). On November 18, Senators Paul (R-Kentucky), Lee (R-Utah) and Sanders (I-Vermont) introduced the resolution of disapproval in the Senate (S.J.Res 31). [Note: the Senate resolution cites November 15 as the date of Congressional notification, based on the date of publication in the Congressional Record -- impacting the date of the start of the 30-day review clock]. On November 29, more than 40 organizations sent Congress a letter supporting the resolutions.
On November 17, the Biden administration announced via a Statement of Administration Policy that it would be opposing an amendment in the FY 2022 National Defense Authorization Act prohibiting U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, calling the amendment "unnecessary" given its cessation of "support for Saudi-led coalition offensive operations in Yemen."
September
On September 21, House Democrats, responding to pressure from progressive colleagues, removed a provision from the stopgap government funding bill that would have provided $1 billion in funding to Israel's Iron Dome air defense system. The next day, Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee introduced a separate bill (H.R. 5323) to provide the Iron Dome funding, which passed the House in a 420-9 vote on September 23 (see vote). On October 4, Senator Menendez called for unanimous consent to approve funding, to which Sen. Paul objected.
On September 16, the State Department notified Congress that it had approved a possible $500 million deal to provide maintenance support services to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The contract would facilitate maintenance for AH-64 Apache attack helicopters, UH-60 Black Hawk utility helicopters, Schweizer 333 helicopters, and Bell 406CS helicopters belonging to the Royal Saudi Land Forces Aviation Command (RSLFAC). The deal would also facilitate maintenance for a future fleet of Saudi CH-47F Chinook transport helicopters.
On September 15, the State Department confirmed reports that the U.S. would withhold $130 million of a possible $300 in million security assistance to Egypt due to human rights concerns. Sec. 7041 of the 2020 Consolidated Appropriations Act establishes several conditions for the delivery of some U.S. Foreign Military Financing to Egypt, including the investigation and prosecution of extrajudicial killings and "release political prisoners and provide detainees with due process of law." International human rights advocates condemned the release of funds, calling the decision a "betrayal" of Biden's commitment to human rights that "sidesteps the intent of Congress."
May
On May 19, Senator Warren and 15 other Senators sent a letter to President Biden, with the request that he "leverage all influence and tools available, including the potential impact on pending weapons sales, U.S.-Saudi military cooperation, and U.S.-Saudi ties more broadly, to demand that Saudi Arabia immediately and unconditionally stop the use of blockade tactics" in relation to Yemen (emphasis added -- not in original letter)
On May 5, the Biden administration notified Congress of a possible direct commercial sale of $735 million in precision-guided weapons to Israel, which became controversial as fighting in Israel intensified and the notification became more broadly public around May 17. Members of Congress introduced resolutions of disapproval on May 19 and 20. See separate resource page.
April
On April 29, Democratic Senators Bob Menendez, Tim Kaine, Patrick Leahy, Chris Coons, Dianne Feinstein, Patty Murray, and Brian Schatz in introduced the Safeguarding Human Rights in Arms Exports Act of 2021, which if passed could impact future sales and Congressional oversight of them.
At a hearing April 21, Senator Murphy expressed concerns about UAE and other sales, the same day the House of Representatives passed the Protection of Saudi Dissidents Act by a vote of 350-71(first re-introduced on Feb. 26), which could put limits on sales to Saudi Arabia.
On April 16, Senator Foreign Relations Committee Chair Bob Menendez with Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced the Secure F-35 Exports Act that could impact the sale of F-35s to the UAE (or other countries in the Middle East, aside from Israel).
On April 13, news broke that the administration had decided to proceed with arms sales to the United Arab Emirates, with details still to be agreed before any delivery would take place--at least a few years from now. On April 14, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Gregory Meeks issued a statement of concern. Relatedly, on April 14, the New York Center for Foreign Policy Affairs amended its complaint on these arms sales, and released a statement about it. See expert commentary below for additional responses.
February
On February 26, after the release of a report on the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, members of the House introduced legislation to stop arms sales to Saudi Arabia. On March 2, 42 organizations included a similar recommendation in a broad reaching response.
On February 25, 41 members of the House, endorsed by many civil society organizations, issued a letter to President Biden asking for clarity on weapons sales to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, expressing their "strong support for your decision to end U.S. participation in offensive operations in the Saudi/UAE-led war in Yemen, as well as related weapons sales..."
On February 11, more than 75 organizations and experts issued a letter detailing $36.5 billion in arms sales and services to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates that they believe should be consider relevant to "offensive operations" and permanently stopped. (See related Foreign Policy exclusive.)
On February 4, President Biden announced the end of "all American support for offensive operations in the war in Yemen, including relevant arms sales." (More information is still needed to clarify what this means for some specific sales, including to the United Arab Emirates, but includes precision guided munitions to Saudi Arabia according to Jake Sullivan during a press conference earlier in the day.)
January
On January 27, Secretary of State Blinken indicated that the State Department was reviewing arms sales, responding to a press question by saying that "Generally speaking when it comes to arms sales, it is typical at the start of an administration to review any – any pending sales, to make sure that what is being considered is something that advances our strategic objectives and advances our foreign policy. So that’s – that’s what we’re doing at this moment.."
This was separately and widely reported as including review of recent controversial arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the UAE:
- Saudi Arabia (see resource page) - 3,000 small diameter bombs (GBU-39) for $290 million notified December 29, 2020; and 7,500 precision-guided, air-to-ground munitions valued at $478 million notified a week earlier.
- United Arab Emirates (see resource page) - $23+ billion notified in November 2020 for up to 50 F-35 Lightning II aircraft, valued at $10.4 billion; up to 18 MQ-9B Unmanned Aerial Systems, valued at $2.97 billion; a package of air-to-air and air-to-ground munitions, valued at $10 billion; and a revised earlier sale of to add hundreds of Sidewinder missiles.
Numerous Congressional and civil society leaders have applauded this review and recommended that sales be stopped altogether or conditioned. See resources below, which will be continually updated.
last updated December 8, 2021.
Experts to contact: Kate Kizer, William Hartung, Scott Paul, Annie Shiel, Jeff Abramson, Brittany Benowitz, Elias Yousif, Seth Binder, Jodi Vittori (corruption)
Select Resources
Government (Biden administration)
- Statement of Administration Policy on S.J.Res. 31, December 7, 2021.
- Statement of Administration Policy on the NDAA, November 17, 2021
- "Remarks by President Biden on America’s Place in the World," February 4, 2021
- "Secretary Antony J. Blinken at a Press Availability" remarks to the press January 27, 2021
Congress
- Various statements during debate on S.J.Res 31 (resolution of disapproval on $650 million Saudi arms sale): Sanders (1, 2), Menendez, + Congressional Progressive Caucus (House)
- Rand Paul, "America Must Stop Enabling The Saudi War In Yemen," The American Conservative, December 7, 2021.
- Press release (Rand Paul) on Senate resolution of disapproval, November 18, 2021
- Press release (Ilhan Omar) on House resolution of disapproval, November 12, 2021
- Representatives Malinowski, McGovern, Schiff, Jacobs, Allred, Castro and Kim respond, November 10, 2021.
- Remarks by Senator Chris Murphy at hearing on Yemen, April 21, 2021.
- Secure F-35 Exports Act (text), press release "Senators Menendez, Feinstein Introduce Secure F-35 Exports Act," April 16, 2021.
- Meeks Issues Statement on Administration’s Decision to Proceed with UAE Weapons Sales, April 14, 2021.
- Letter from 41 members of Congress urging transparency from Biden administration regarding involvement in Yemen as US ends support for "offensive engagement," February 25, 2021.
- Chris Murphy, "America’s Middle East Policy Is Outdated and Dangerous," Foreign Affairs, February 19, 2021.
- "On The Senate Floor, Murphy: The Biden Administration Is Off To A Good Start By Ending U.S. Military Support For Yemen War, Suspending Arms Sales To Saudi Arabia And The United Arab Emirates," Senator Chris Murphy, January 28, 2021. See also related tweets on February 3 (here and here).
- Letter to Secretary of State Blinken that includes call for suspension of some weapons sales from Representatives Tom Malinowski, Gregory Meeks, Adam Smith, and James McGovern, January 26, 2021.
- On January 15, 2021, House Foreign Affairs Committee chair Gregory Meeks (D-NY) announced the introduction of joint resolutions of disapproval for the December 23 and 29 sales to Saudi Arabia (see HJ Res 15 [small diameter bombs] and 16 [PGMs])
- "Ro Khanna, Congressional Progressive Caucus Statement Denouncing Harmful, Counterproductive Designation Of Houthis As A Terrorist Organization" statement, which includes call to end military support to Saudi-led coalition, January 15, 2021.
Civil Society
- , Organizational statements
- Joint Letter to Congress on Saudi Arms Sale, 40+ organizations, November 29, 2021. Individual organizations statements after the December 7 vote include this by Win Without War.
- "Letter to President Biden on US Policy Toward the Middle East," Human Rights Watch, November 3, 2021.
- Letter from more than 75 organizations and experts, February 11, 2021.
- "Arms Sale Freeze is a Major Victory. Now Make it Permanent," Win Without War, January 27, 2021
- New York Center for Foreign Policy Affairs, statements, February 4 and January 27, 2021.
- "A Strong Majority of Voters Oppose the U.S. Arms Sale to Saudi Arabia," Data for Progress, December 7, 2021.
- Sarah Leah Whitson, "Congress Must Halt Biden’s Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia," Foreign Policy, December 6, 2021.
- William Hartung, "Arming Repression: U.S. Military Support for Saudi Arabia from Trump to Biden," Center for International Policy, December 2, 2021; "The Biden Administration’s Missile Sale to Saudi Arabia Is Offensive, and Must Be Stopped," Forbes, November 28, 2021; and "Congress Should Cut Off U.S. Military Support for Saudi Arabia," Forbes, November 8, 2021.
- William Ostermeyer and Jeff Abramson, "U.S. Continues Controversial Arms Assistance," Arms Control Today, November 2, 2021.
- Lauren Woods, "U.S. Foreign Military Training to Saudi Arabia," Security Assistance Monitor, July 2021.
- Elias Yousif, "Factsheet: Enduring U.S. Support for Saudi-Led Operations in Yemen," Security Assistance Monitor, June 2021.
- William Hartung, "Issue Brief: Transferring Arms To The UAE Is Not In U.S. Security Interests," Center for International Policy, April 15, 2021; "Fueling Conflict: U.S. Arms Sales to the United Arab Emirates and the U.S.-UAE Military Alliance," Center for International Policy, January 27, 2021. See also "Don’t stop with Saudis — Biden must cut off weapons to UAE, too," Responsible Statecraft, February 17, 2021.
- "Biden slams the brakes on UAE, Saudi weapons gravy train — for now." Responsible Statecraft, January 27, 2021.
- Annie Shiel, Seth Binder, Jeff Abramson, William Hartung, Rachel Stohl, Diana Ohlbaum, Adam Isacson, Brittany Benowitz and Dan Mahanty, "Toward A More Responsible US Arms Trade Policy: Recommendations for the Biden-Harris Administration," Just Security, January 19, 2021
- On December 30, the New York Center for Foreign Policy Affairs filed a lawsuit seeking to block sales to the United Arab Emirates (see press release, brief).
- Shayna Lewis, "Defense contractors like Raytheon aren't blameless in Yemen crisis," AZ Central, February 3, 2021.
- Ethan B Kapstein and Jonathan D. Caverley, "Biden Must Base Arms Sales on U.S. Interests—Not U.S. Jobs," Foreign Policy, February 25, 2021.
EXPERT RESPONSES
Forum on the Arms Trade-listed experts* provided the following public comments on this topic. Please contact experts directly for further comments:
William Hartung Director, Arms and Security Project, Center for International Policy - April 14, 2021
|
The Biden administration's decision to go ahead with the Trump administration's lame-duck arms package of F-35 combat aircraft, armed drones, and billions of dollars worth of bombs to the UAE contradicts its pledge to make human rights and U.S. security interests the central concerns in deciding which nations to supply with U.S. weaponry. From its role in the brutal intervention in Yemen, to its violation of the UN arms embargo on opposition forces in Libya, to its severe internal human rights abuses, the UAE should not be receiving U.S. arms sales at this time. Continuing to endorse and enable the UAE's reckless conduct in the Middle East and North Africa will only serve to undermine stability in the region and reduce the prospects for a peaceful resolution of conflicts in the area. |
See also "Issue Brief: Transferring Arms To The UAE Is Not In U.S. Security Interests," Center for International Policy, April 15, 2021;
Jeff Abramson Senior Fellow, Arms Control Association - April 14, 2021
|
The Biden administration needs to be serious about no longer arming abusive regimes, especially those with a track record of misuse of weapons. The decision to continue arming the United Arab Emirates is the wrong one. |
Annie Shiel Senior Advisor for U.S. Policy and Advocacy, Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) - April 14, 2021
|
Moving forward with these sales undermines President Biden's and Secretary Blinken's commitment to center human rights in foreign policy, betrays the will of the majority of Democrats who voted against the sales in December, and sends a clear signal of impunity for the UAE’s conduct -- including likely violations of international humanitarian law -- that will be heard around the world. Most importantly, it's a slap in the face to victims of conflict in Yemen and beyond. |
A. Trevor Thrall Associate Professor, George Mason University || Senior Fellow, Cato Institute - April 17, 2021
with Jordan Cohen Emerging Expert see full Defense One opinion
with Jordan Cohen Emerging Expert see full Defense One opinion
|
The Biden administration told Congress on April 13 that it plans to proceed with a $23 billion sale of advanced weaponry to the United Arab Emirates originally approved by the Trump team – including the F-35 advanced joint fighter aircraft. Biden has yet to provide a clear rationale for continuing the sale, but following the previous administration’s logic, advocates believe it will help curb Iran’s ambitions in the Middle East. The reality, however, is that these sales will further entangle the United States and amplify existing conflicts in the troubled region. |
See also select comments from experts not listed by the Forum
Abdullah Alaoudh, Research Director for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates at Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN) - April 14, 2021
Abdullah Alaoudh, Research Director for Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates at Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN) - April 14, 2021
Fulfilling arms deals with the UAE rewards the Emirati government for war crimes it has committed in Yemen and Libya and for its support for dictators like Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egyptian President Abdel-Fatah al-Sisi. It sends a message to dictators around the world that Biden is continuing Trump’s bromance with dictators.
Justin Thomas Russell, Principal Director, New York Center for Foreign Policy Affairs - April 14, 2021 see full press release and related amended legal complaint
We had hoped that the Biden team would take into account the impact that these weapons could have in the wrong hands. We had hoped that the Biden Administration would have been up front with the global community regarding their reasoning... We had hoped that the Biden Administration would have put the mitigation of the humanitarian crises in Libya and Yemen above starting what could be an arms race in this sensitive region of the world. We had hoped for better things out of the Biden Administration...and now those hopes have been dashed.
Sunjeev Bery, Executive Director, Freedom Forward - April 14, 2021
President Biden is turning one of Donald Trump's worst decisions on arming dictators into a permanent reality. The UAE monarchy has helped kill thousands of civilians in Yemen and worked to block democracy across the Middle East. The Biden administration decision to allow billions of dollars in arms sales to the UAE dictatorship pours vast amounts of gasoline on the fires set by a regional dictator who should be shunned.
Philippe Nassif, Advocacy Director, Middle East and North Africa, Amnesty International USA - April 14, 2021 see full statement
These are not the actions of a President committed to upholding human rights in the United States and abroad. The startling fact that the Biden administration continues the previous administration’s unflinching support of providing weapons that risk adding to the devastating toll of Yemeni civilians unlawfully killed and injured by United States-made weapons should shake to the core every person who supports human rights.
Cavan Kharrazian, Progressive Foreign Policy Campaigner, Demand Progress - April 14, 2021 see full statement
The United Arab Emirates’ appalling track record in Yemen has contributed significantly to the worst humanitarian crisis in the world, and the UAE’s past arm transfers of U.S. equipment to al-Qaeda-linked militias in Yemen and mercenaries in Libya should be a non-starter for any further U.S. weapons sales.
Afrah Nasser, Yemen Researcher, Middle East and North Africa Division, Human Rights Watch, see full article
Resuming arms sales without first ensuring that the UAE is taking meaningful steps towards accountability for previous unlawful attacks just creates a situation in which those violations could happen again, with no one being held responsible. In resuming these arms sales, the US government once again risks complicity in future violations.
Kate Kizer Policy Director, Win Without War - January 27, 2021
|
“...Simply freezing these sales and later resuming them would only be a slap in the face to the victims of these two monarchies’ actions in these conflicts. This must be a first step towards real accountability, not only for the repeated violations of international and domestic law, but also for the U.S. alliances with these monarchies that have, thus far, been a blank check for impunity. To fully fulfill his campaign promises, the Biden administration must stop arming unaccountable authoritarian governments for good." See full statement here. |
* Inclusion on the Forum on the Arms Trade expert list does not indicate agreement with or endorsement of the opinions of others. Institutional affiliation is indicated for identification purposes only. Please contact experts directly for further comments.