Forum on the Arms Trade
  • Home
  • Experts
  • Emerging Experts
  • Expertos y Expertas Emergentes
  • Annual Conference 2025
  • Events
  • U.S. Arms Transfers to Israel - Trump
  • Biden Arms Transfers To Israel
  • HD State Tracker
  • Jobs Corner
  • Media directories
    • Middle East
    • General US arms sales
    • Ukraine
  • Major Arms Sales Notifications Tracker
  • U.S. Conventional Arms Transfer (CAT) Policy
  • U.S.-Saudi Arms Sales
  • U.S. Arms Sales to Taiwan
  • U.S. Arms Sales to India
  • U.S. Landmine Policy
  • Resource Page - Under Threshold Arms Sales
  • Resource Page - USML Cat I-III to Commerce
  • Get on the list
  • About
  • Archives
    • All archives
    • Newsletter
    • Blog

Event Report - “Challenges and Opportunities Posed by New Technologies and Innovation in SALW Control” (May 22, 2025)

5/28/2025

0 Comments

 
About

On May 22, the Forum on the Arms Trade hosted an event to explore the technological advancements – such as 3D printing, modular weapon designs, polymer components, and the proliferation of online platforms – that have transformed the landscape of small arms and light weapons (SALW) manufacturing and distribution. Experts examined how such innovations present both significant challenges and unique opportunities for arms control regulation, exploring how international regulatory instruments and national practices can adapt to the evolving technological environment. Followed by an engaging Q/A, the experts presented recommendations and best practices for the upcoming Open-Ended Technical Experts Group (OETG), which is scheduled to convene within the week of the Biennial Meetings of States (BMS) in 2026 and 2028, to consider the challenges posed by recent and ongoing developments in weapons manufacturing, technology, and design, and explore potential opportunities to strengthen the implementation of the Program of Action (UN PoA) and its International Tracing Instrument (ITI). 

Speakers

  • Nicolas Florquin, Head, Data and Analytics Unit, Small Arms Survey
  • Matilde Vecchioni, Associate Researcher, Conventional Arms and Ammunition Programme, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)
  • Frida Thomassen, Political Affairs Officer, UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA)
  • Monalisa Hazarika, Emerging Expert, Forum on the Arms Trade (moderator)

Video

A recording of the event is available at https://youtu.be/SZc6k7Wf4DY?t=163

Recommendations and Resources 

Panelists provided the following recommendations and suggested resources during the event or in the drafting of this report.

Nicolas Florquin, Head, Data and Analytics Unit, Small Arms Survey

Recommendations
  • Technical measures coordinated under a strategic vision can offer some promising mitigation strategies that are important for the short to medium term, drawing upon experiences from regional contexts and other mechanisms. Some examples/factors include:
    • Resolution 12/3 (2024) of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime includes recommendations related to the regulation of 3D printed firearm blueprints, the need for specialized training for law enforcement and regulatory authorities, the need to develop capacities to detect and investigate privately made firearms (PMFs), and information sharing. 
    • Existing and new sectors/groups that have expertise or need to be considered are law enforcement and forensic experts, postal services (due to the use of parcels for trafficking PMF parts, etc.), public health sector, non-traditional groups not previously engaged in firearms-related criminal activities (for instance folks doing it as a challenge and others motivated by niche political ideologies) as well as youth, including minors, for which educators and parents are important.
    • Ideas such as “design against crime” to incorporate crime prevention features in new technologies.
  • We need to consider how to make the knowledge sharing more permanent and give the international community the means to be much more responsive and to anticipate some developments. The OETG will therefore need to consider whether the latest trends in PMFs should be integrated more systematically and in the long run in the UN PoA process and future BMSes, or another appropriate forum. This would allow for information sharing to occur on a regular basis and in the long term, and regional organisations and the law enforcement/forensic communities can play important roles in this longer term surveillance.
  • We musn't forget that legally manufactured industrial weapons still represent the bulk of seized firearms and by a margin in most places, and so while we need to tackle the threat of PMFs, the need to implement existing and well established measures to control industrially made weapons remains crucial.

Suggested resources
  • “The growing and multifaceted global threat of privately made and other non-industrial small arms and light weapons,”  Small Arms Survey, Instituto Sou da Paz, and the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), June 2024.
  • Yulia Yarina and Nicolas Florquin, “Dangerous Devices: Privately Made Firearms in the Caribbean,” Small Arms Survey, June 2024.
  • Matt Schroeder, Nicolas Florquin, Anne-Séverine Fabre, and Andrea Edoardo Varisco, “Privately Made Firearms in the European Union,” INSIGHT Project, Small Arms Survey, December 2023.
  • Julien Joly and Aline Shaban, “Between Tradition and the Law: Artisanal Firearm Production in West Africa,” Small Arms Survey, November 2023.
  • Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, “Blocking the Blueprint: Technological Barriers Against 3D-Printed Firearms,” Global Network on Extremism & Technology, November 2024.
  • Small Arms Survey webpage on privately made firearms


Matilde Vecchioni, Associate Researcher, Conventional Arms and Ammunition Programme, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)

Recommendations
  • There is a need to bridge the gap in knowledge that exists between the technical community and diplomatic and policy circles on the current realities and developments in illicit SALW manufacturing. Technical experts, research institutions and civil society organizations have advanced knowledge about key trends, technologies, and actors in this domain. It is therefore critical, in preparation to the OETG, to ensure that platforms are provided for this technical knowledge to reach the diplomatic community.
  • The improvement of existing legislative frameworks and national regulatory approaches needs to be informed by disaggregated and up-to-date data. Enhancing law enforcement agencies capacity to collect and record – in a centralized and consistent manner – data on craft-produced SALW and components is fundamental. It can allow us to identify key national and transnational developments, pinpoint potential trends and improve traceability. On this, it is also critical to leverage good practices and effective legislative measures from national contexts and provide opportunities for these to be shared within and across regions.
  • Social media platforms and online service providers are key actors to engage. From an operational perspective, enhancing monitoring and patrolling of online spaces represents a promising strategy to prevent illicit manufacturing and to improve law enforcement’s awareness of emerging trends and tactics. Establishing cooperative relationships and open dialogue with social media providers can significantly support these objectives.
  • Technologies – such as 2D codes, chemical encoding, RFID, DLT, AI – can present significant opportunities for preventing or countering diversion in international conventional arms transfer control. However, their application requires a multi-step, needs-driven and context-specific approach. A dialogue among all relevant stakeholders remains critical, and should include the technology development companies, the industrial sectors which would need to deploy and adapt to such technologies, civil society, and state representatives.

Suggested resources
  • Matilde Vecchioni, “Unregulated Production: Examining Craft-Produced Weapons from a Global Perspective,” UNIDIR, June 2024.
  • Matilde Vecchioni, “Addressing the proliferation of improvised and craft-produced weapons: Why should we care?” UNIDIR, October 2022.
  • Sarah Grand-Clément, “Assessing Technologies to Counter the Diversion of Small Arms and Light Weapons,” UNIDIR and Flemish Peace Institute, June 2024.
  • Sarah Grand-Clément and Diederik Cops,“Technologies to Counter the Diversion of Small Arms and Light Weapons, and Components of Conventional Weapons,”  UNIDIR and Flemish Peace Institute, August 2023.
  • Rueben Dass, “3D-Printed Firearms: Global Proliferation Trends and Analyses,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–35, May 2025.

Frida Thomassen, Political Affairs Officer, UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA)

Recommendations
  • For the the Open-Ended Technical Expert Group (OETG) to be successful, we need to:
    • Prioritize well informed preparatory and intersessional work, including expert seminars and consultations, to build momentum and support consensus-building ahead of formal meetings that are only 2-3 days in 2026 and 2028.
    • Actively support participation from all Member States through sponsorships, preparatory capacity-building across regions.
    • Ensure inclusive practices, including through gender balance on delegations as well as youth engagement in the process.
    • Encourage States to share effective practices and lessons learned to bridge regulatory, capacity, and technological gaps between States. 
    • Utilizing  the OETG as a platform to bring technical expertise closer to political processes, and encourage a whole-of government approach to the issue of illicit SALW. 
    • Involve relevant subject matter experts from civil society, academia, and the private sector, through briefings and consultations to enrich the group’s technical understanding.
    • Focus on developing practical recommendations that will meet consensus preferably in 2028 and latest 2030. ​​

​Suggested resources
  • Final report of Programme of Action on SALW Fourth Review Conference (Outcome Document with OETG mandate in Annex) – A/CONF.192/2024/RC/3 – 2024.
  • Side event on the OETG during First Committee, 2024. See article on this and other relevant developments   
  • Chair's Summary of the Second Open-ended Meeting of Governmental Experts on developments in SALW, 2015


The Forum on the Arms Trade provides a platform for sharing of views but does not itself take a position. Videos and resources about events are available online.
​
0 Comments

Final Report — Webinar "Arms Control and Human Rights: Connecting Agendas" (April 22, 2025)

5/2/2025

0 Comments

 
Introduction

On April 22, 2025, the webinar "Arms Control and Human Rights: Connecting Agendas" was held, organized by Control Arms in collaboration with the Forum on the Arms Trade and the Asociación para las Políticas Públicas (Association for Public Policies).

The seminar examined the link between the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) and efforts to address serious human rights violations, exploring examples such as:
  • The 2023 advisory opinion led by Mexico,
  • The impact of arms transfers on the Haitian crisis,
  • The role of transparency in strengthening human rights.

Participants
  • María Pía Devoto, Director, Asociación para las Políticas Públicas
  • Pablo Arrocha Olabuenaga, Legal Advisor, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Mexico
  • Kim Lamberty, Executive Director, Quixote Center
  • Sol Zoe Nottage, Associate Researcher, ATT Monitor
Recording Guide (with timestamps)

00:04:09 – General commentary by María Pía Devoto on the relationship between Human Rights and arms transfers
  • Differences between arms trafficking, smuggling, and diversion.
  • Regional context: high firearm-related homicide rates.
  • Prevalence of legally owned firearms diverted to criminal activities.
  • Explanation of Article 11 of the ATT.
  • Setbacks in human rights in Nicaragua, Ecuador, El Salvador, Venezuela, and Haiti.

Question 1: Overview of risks, challenges, and issues regarding arms transfers in the cases of Mexico and Haiti

00:12:29 – Presentation by Kim Lamberty (Haiti):
  • Description of the severe crisis in Haiti, marked by armed gangs controlling territories.
  • Customs and state corruption facilitating arms entry.
  • Humanitarian impact: internal displacement, child recruitment, widespread sexual violence.

00:20:21 – Presentation by Pablo Arrocha (Mexico):
  • Lack of effective regulation at the U.S. border.
  • Impact of arms trafficking on organized crime violence.
  • Need to strengthen bilateral cooperation mechanisms and legal strategies.

Question 2: What are the solutions to mitigate illicit arms transfers?

00:33:29 – Kim Lamberty:
  • Pressuring governments to enhance border controls.
  • Expanding the volume of firearms traced.
  • Improving inter-agency collaboration within the United States.

00:39:38 – Pablo Arrocha:
  • Explanation of Mexico’s strategy based on strategic litigation in U.S. courts.
  • Description of parallel actions before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to reinforce a human rights approach.
  • Analyzing the full life cycle of a firearm to understand how they reach Mexico.

00:51:19 – Comment by María Pía Devoto:
  • Emphasis on the importance of transparency in arms transfers as a preventive mechanism.
  • Transparency as a means to prevent and mitigate human rights violations.

00:52:39 – Presentation by Sol Zoe Nottage:
  • Presentation on the importance of transparency within the ATT framework.
  • Analysis of States' reporting levels and their relationship to accountability in human rights.

Q&A SessionQuestion 1: How can civil society effectively address threats linked to irresponsible arms transfers? (01:00:38)
  • Response by Pablo Arrocha (01:02:56)
  • Response by Kim Lamberty (01:06:04)

Question 2: Which entities use corruption to illicitly traffic arms into Haiti? (01:07:28)
  • Response by Kim Lamberty (01:10:03)

Question 3: What could the ATT do to address internal diversion of arms? What would be the next step if Mexico's litigation strategy is successful? (01:11:00)
  • Response by Pablo Arrocha (01:13:00)

Question 4: What has changed in Haiti over the past 20 years and what was missing to prevent the current situation? (01:18:10)
  • Response by Kim Lamberty (01:20:32)

Question 5: Are lawsuits enough to change the narrative around arms in the U.S.? (01:22:23)
  • Response by Pablo Arrocha (01:24:33)

Final Reflections
01:31:00 – Sol Zoe Nottage:
  • Stressed the need for States to be transparent and highlighted the advantages of transparency for human rights protection.

01:32:27 – Pablo Arrocha:
  • Stated that the ATT must be revitalized as an ongoing process and not just seen as a past achievement.
  • Called for strengthening multilateralism in arms control.

01:36:42 – Kim Lamberty:
  • Emphasized the importance of amplifying the visibility of illegal arms trafficking and its humanitarian consequences, especially in crises like Haiti.


Presentations

Presentation used by Sol Zoe Nottage:
Implementing the ATT in the Americas: Transparency as a Means to Prevent and Mitigate Human Rights Violations.

https://www.canva.com/design/DAGkuwYqjio/GMByCdhkcroJTduBET9VrQ/edit?utm_content=DAGkuwYqjio&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton

Additional Resources

ATT Monitor. (2024). Chapter 2.1: Annual Report Analysis. Control Arms. https://attmonitor.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ATT_2024_Chapter-2.1.pdf

Bureau des Avocats Internationaux, Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti, & Partners in Health. (2024, March). CSW Parallel Event: Advancing the Rights of Haitian Women & Girls: Haiti’s Transition & Beyond [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEXVaCX5Lf8

Human Rights Watch. (2024, November 25). Haiti: Scarce protection as sexual violence escalates. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/11/25/haiti-scarce-protection-sexual-violence-escalates

Quixote Center. (2024). Petition to DHS to end weapons trafficking. https://quixote.org/action#/18

ATT Monitor. (2024). ATT Arms Transfers Dashboard. https://attmonitor.org/en/att-arms-dashboard/
​
0 Comments

Reporte Final — Webinar "Control de armas y derechos humanos: Conectando agendas" (22 de abril de 2025)

5/1/2025

0 Comments

 
Introducción

El 22 de abril de 2025 se llevó a cabo el webinar "Control de armas y derechos humanos: Conectando agendas", organizado por Control Arms en colaboración con Forum on the Arms Trade y la Asociación para las Políticas Públicas. El seminario examinó el vínculo entre el Tratado sobre el Comercio de Armas (TCA) y los esfuerzos para abordar graves violaciones de derechos humanos, explorando ejemplos como:
  • La opinión consultiva de 2023 impulsada por México,
  • El impacto de las transferencias de armas en la crisis haitiana,
  • Y el rol de la transparencia en el fortalecimiento de derechos humanos.

​Participantes
  • María Pía Devoto, Directora, Asociación para las Políticas Públicas
  • Pablo Arrocha Olabuenaga, Asesor Jurídico, Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de México
  • Kim Lamberty, Directora Ejecutiva, Quixote Center
  • Sol Zoe Nottage, Investigadora Asociada, ATT Monitor
Guía de la grabación (con marcas de tiempo)

00:03:30 – Comentario general sobre la relación entre Derechos Humanos y transferencias de armas a cargo de María Pía Devoto
  • Diferencias entre tráfico, contrabando y desvío de armas.
  • Contexto regional: gran cantidad de homicidios per cápita por causa de las armas de fuego.
  • Predominio de armas legales desviadas hacia actividades criminales.
  • Explicación del Artículo 11 del TCA
  • Retrocesos en derechos humanos en Nicaragua, Ecuador, El Salvador, Venezuela y Haití.

Pregunta 1: Visión de riesgos, desafíos y problemas en relación a las transferencias de armas en los casos de México y Haití

00:12:10 – Exposición Kim Lamberty (Haití):
  • Descripción de la grave crisis en Haití, marcada por el control de territorios por parte de bandas armadas.
  • Corrupción aduanera y estatal que facilita la entrada de armas.
  • Impacto humanitario: desplazamiento interno, reclutamiento infantil, violencia sexual generalizada.

00:20:34 – Exposición Pablo Arrocha (México):  
  • Falta de regulación efectiva en la frontera estadounidense.
  • Impacto del tráfico de armas en la violencia del crimen organizado.
  • Necesidad de fortalecer mecanismos de cooperación bilateral y estrategias jurídicas.

Pregunta 2: ¿Cuáles son las soluciones para mitigar las transferencias ilícitas de armas?

00:33:30 – Kim Lamberty:
  • Presionar a los gobiernos para aumentar los controles en fronteras
  • Ampliar el volumen de armas analizadas para su trazabilidad
  • Mejorar la colaboración entre distintas agencias gubernamentales en Estados Unidos. 

00:39:36 – Pablo Arrocha:
  • Explica la estrategia de México basada en el litigio estratégico en cortes estadounidenses.
  • Describe acciones paralelas ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos para reforzar el enfoque en derechos humanos.
  • Analizar el ciclo completo del arma para observar cómo llegan a México.

00:50:46 – Comentario María Pía Devoto:
  • Subraya la importancia de la transparencia en las transferencias de armas como mecanismo de prevención.

Transparencia como medio para prevenir y mitigar las violaciones de los derechos humanos

00:52:35 – Exposición Sol Zoe Nottage:
  • Presentación sobre la importancia de la transparencia en el marco del TCA.
  • Análisis de los niveles de reporte de los Estados y su relación con la rendición de cuentas en materia de derechos humanos.

Sesión de preguntas y respuestas (Q&A)

Pregunta 1: ¿Cómo puede la sociedad civil abordar eficazmente las amenazas vinculadas a transferencias irresponsables de armas? (01:00:48)
  • Respuesta Pablo Arrocha (01:02:50)
  • Respuesta Kim Lamberty (01:06:02)

Pregunta 2: ¿Cuáles son las entidades que utilizan la corrupción para traficar ilícitamente armas en Haití? (01:09:39)   
  • Respuesta Kim Lamberty (01:10:04)

Pregunta 3: ¿Qué se podría hacer desde el TCA para abordar el desvío interno de armas? ¿Y cuál sería el siguiente paso si la estrategia de litigios de México es exitosa? (01:12:15)
  • Respuesta Pablo Arrocha (01:13:10)

Pregunta 4: ¿Qué cambió en los últimos 20 años en Haití y qué faltó para evitar la situación actual? (01:19:25)
  • Respuesta Kim Lamberty (01:20:32)

Pregunta 5: ¿Son suficientes los litigios para cambiar la narrativa sobre armas en EE.UU.? (01:24:07)
  • Respuesta Pablo Arrocha (01:24:48)

Reflexiones finales
  • 01:31:00 – Sol Zoe Nottage:
    Subrayó la necesidad de que los Estados sean transparentes y las ventajas de la transparencia para el ejercicio de los derechos humanos.
  • 01:32:08 – Pablo Arrocha:
    Señaló que el TCA debe ser revitalizado como un proceso permanente y no solo un logro pasado.  Llamó a fortalecer el multilateralismo en el control de armas.
  • 01:35:55 – Kim Lamberty:
    Recordó la importancia de amplificar la visibilidad del tráfico de armas ilegales y sus consecuencias humanitarias, especialmente en crisis como la de Haití.

Presentaciones 

Presentación usada por Sol Zoe Nottage: Implementando el TCA en las Américas: transparencia como medio para prevenir y mitigar las violaciones de los derechos humanos.
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGkuwYqjio/GMByCdhkcroJTduBET9VrQ/edit?utm_content=DAGkuwYqjio&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link2&utm_source=sharebutton


Recursos complementarios

ATT Monitor. (2024). Chapter 2.1: Annual Report Analysis. Control Arms. https://attmonitor.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ATT_2024_Chapter-2.1.pdf

Bureau des Avocats Internationaux, Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti, & Partners in Health. (2024, March). CSW Parallel Event: Advancing the rights of Haitian women & girls: Haiti’s transition & beyond [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEXVaCX5Lf8

Human Rights Watch. (2024, November 25). Haiti: Scarce protection as sexual violence escalates. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/11/25/haiti-scarce-protection-sexual-violence-escalates

Quixote Center. (2024). Petition to DHS to end weapons trafficking. https://quixote.org/action#/18

ATT Monitor. (2024). ATT Arms Transfers Dashboard. https://attmonitor.org/en/att-arms-dashboard/

0 Comments

    About

    The "Looking Ahead Blog" features comments concerning short- to medium-term trends related to the arms trade, security assistance, and weapons use. Typically about 500-1000 words, each comment is written by an expert listed on the Forum on the Arms Trade related to topics of each expert's choosing.

    We have a number of special series including: 


    Looking Ahead 2025
    Looking Ahead 2024
    Looking Ahead 2023
    Looking Ahead 2022
    ​Looking Ahead 2021
    Looking Ahead 2020

    Looking Ahead 2019
    Looking Ahead 2018
    First 100 Days (April/May '17)

    Looking Ahead 2017

    Inclusion on the Forum on the Arms Trade expert list does not indicate agreement with or endorsement of the opinions of others. Institutional affiliation is indicated for identification purposes only.

    Archives

    November 2025
    May 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    September 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    August 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    January 2021
    July 2020
    May 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    July 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    May 2018
    December 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015

    Pdf's

    March 11 (2015)

    Categories

    All
    Adam Isacson
    Africa
    Alejandro Sanchez
    Allison Pytlak
    Amy Nelson
    Anna Stavrianakis
    Arms Sales
    Arms Trade Treaty
    Arms Trafficking
    Aude Fleurant
    Bonnie Docherty
    Brian Castner
    Child Soldiers
    Colby Goodman
    Corruption
    Cyber
    Dan Gettinger
    Danielle Preskitt
    Divestment
    Doug Weir
    Drones
    Emerging Experts
    End-use Monitoring
    Environment
    Erin Hunt
    Europe
    Exploration Of Arms Reduction And Jobs
    Explosive Weapons
    First 100 Days
    Frank Slijper
    Gender
    Global Trade Trends
    Harm To Civilians
    Hector Guerra
    High School Debate '19 20
    High School Debate '19-20
    Humanitarian Disarmament
    Human Rights Due Diligence
    Iain Overton
    Investors
    Jeff Abramson
    Jen Spindel
    Jobs
    John Lindsay Poland
    John Lindsay-Poland
    Jordan Cohen
    Kate Kizer
    Killer Robots
    Landmines/cluster Munitions
    Latin America
    Laura Boillot
    Lode Dewaegheneire
    Looking Ahead 2017
    Looking Ahead 2018
    Looking Ahead 2019
    Looking Ahead 2020
    Looking Ahead 2021
    Looking Ahead 2022
    Looking Ahead 2023
    Looking Ahead 2024
    Looking Ahead 2025
    Maria Pia Devoto
    Martin Butcher
    Matthew Bolton
    Middle East
    Military Expenditures
    Natalie Goldring
    Nicholas Marsh
    Non State Actors
    Paul Holtom
    Rachel Stohl
    Ray Acheson
    Robert Muggah
    Robert Watson
    Roy Isbister
    SALW
    Samuel Perlo Freeman
    Samuel Perlo-Freeman
    Security Assistance
    Seth Binder
    Shannon Dick
    Suicide Bombing
    Summit For Democracy
    Sustainable Development
    Tobias Bock
    Transparency
    Ukraine War
    UN Register
    Victim Assistance
    Wanda Muñoz
    War In Ukraine
    William Hartung
    Wim Zwijnenburg
    Yeshua Moser-Puangsuwan

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly